[docs]classCombinatorialProofs:"""Automates proof verification by searching for valid proof sequences."""
[docs]@staticmethoddefbrute_force_proof(goal:LogicalExpression,premises:List[LogicalExpression],max_depth:int=5)->Optional[Proof]:""" Tries all possible proof sequences up to `max_depth` steps. Returns the shortest valid proof if found, else None. """known_statements={i+1:premisefori,premiseinenumerate(premises)}proof_steps=[ProofStep(step_number=i+1,statement=premise,justification="Given")fori,premiseinenumerate(premises)]for_depthinrange(1,max_depth+1):forperminpermutations(list(known_statements.keys()),2):# Try all 2-combinations of premisesp,q=known_statements[perm[0]],known_statements[perm[1]]# Try all inference rulesderived_statements=[InferenceRules.modus_ponens(p,q),InferenceRules.modus_tollens(p,q),InferenceRules.hypothetical_syllogism(p,q),InferenceRules.disjunctive_syllogism(p,q),EquivalenceRules.apply_de_morgan(p),EquivalenceRules.double_negation(p),]fornew_statementinderived_statements:ifnew_statementandnew_statementnotinknown_statements.values():step_number=len(known_statements)+1known_statements[step_number]=new_statementproof_steps.append(ProofStep(step_number=step_number,statement=new_statement,justification="Derived",dependencies=[perm[0],perm[1]],))ifnew_statement==goal:returnProof(steps=proof_steps)# Return proof if goal is reachedreturnNone# No proof found within max depth
[docs]@staticmethoddefvalidate_proof(proof:Proof)->bool:"""Validates whether a given proof follows logical derivation rules."""returnproof.is_valid()